Visa Acceptance Risk Standards: The Difference between Mandatory and Recommended Controls
Caroline Hometh Caroline Hometh

Visa Acceptance Risk Standards: The Difference between Mandatory and Recommended Controls

In an era of increasing cyber threats and complex regulatory expectations, understanding the difference between mandatory and recommended controls is pivotal. Compliance with mandatory requirements is non-negotiable, but leveraging recommended controls can elevate a business’s risk management strategy. By integrating both sets of controls, merchants underscore their dedication to a safer transaction environment—ultimately benefiting their brand, their customers, and the broader payments ecosystem. In the future, the payments industry that adopt recommended measures will be better positioned to adapt to evolving threats and maintain trust across the digital commerce landscape. An integrated approach ensures businesses remain resilient in an evolving ecosystem.

Read More
New Requirement for Checking the Terminated Merchant File Reporting Before a Merchant is Onboarded
Caroline Hometh Caroline Hometh

New Requirement for Checking the Terminated Merchant File Reporting Before a Merchant is Onboarded

Visa’s recent update to require an Acquirer to check the Terminated Merchant File (TMF) before onboarding a new merchant signals a significant change in the payments industry. The TMF contains merchants who have been flagged for violations or fraudulent activity in the past, serving as a safeguard against risky partnerships. By making this check mandatory, Visa aims to foster a more secure ecosystem, reduce financial fraud, and protect both the Acquirer and its broader network.

Read More
Decoding the Interchange Enigma: What ISVs and Merchants Need to Know
Sarah Story Sarah Story

Decoding the Interchange Enigma: What ISVs and Merchants Need to Know

Interchange fees represent a substantial operational cost for businesses accepting card payments. While these fees are a necessary part of the payment ecosystem, a deep understanding of their structure and influencing factors empowers payment processors to optimize payment strategies and minimize expenses.

The payment processor’s acquiring bank pays interchange fees to the card-issuing bank for each transaction. This fee covers the costs associated with issuing and maintaining cards, providing rewards, managing fraud and bad debt, and the inherent risk assumed by issuing banks. However, the complexity of interchange fee schedules can make it challenging for processors to understand precisely what they are paying and why.

Read More
Visa has transitioned from quarterly to monthly reviews for exception reporting
Joseph Arthur Joseph Arthur

Visa has transitioned from quarterly to monthly reviews for exception reporting

Ultimately, the new Visa Acceptance Risk Standards underscore the industry’s commitment to innovation, security, and trust. By refining its approach to exception reporting, Visa fosters a healthier payments ecosystem—one where businesses can operate confidently, customers feel protected, and technology-driven insights shape a resilient and future-ready marketplace.

Read More
Update on Visa’s new Standards for Third Party Compliance
Caroline Hometh Caroline Hometh

Update on Visa’s new Standards for Third Party Compliance

Visa’s retirement of the Global Acquiring Risk Standards (GARS) and introduction of the new Visa Acceptance Risk Standards (VARS) signals a significant shift in how acquiring banks, payment facilitators, and other stakeholders manage risk and ensure compliance. The overarching goal remains to protect the payments ecosystem from fraud and reputational harm, but VARS introduces a more dynamic framework that places a stronger emphasis on third-party oversight.

Read More
GARS retirement presents VARS: Archetypes and Risk Domains
Caroline Hometh Caroline Hometh

GARS retirement presents VARS: Archetypes and Risk Domains

By combining Archetypes and Risk Domains, Visa Acceptance Risk Standards offer a more granular and proactive approach to safeguarding payment ecosystems. This new framework not only empowers acquirers to tackle emerging threats with precision, but also fosters greater trust and transparency among consumers, merchants, and the broader financial community. The result is a streamlined, future-ready standard that underpins resilience in a rapidly evolving payments landscape.

Read More
Navigating the Evolving Payments Ecosystem: A Strategic Imperative for Acquirers and TPAs
Emily Baxter Emily Baxter

Navigating the Evolving Payments Ecosystem: A Strategic Imperative for Acquirers and TPAs

The payments landscape is undergoing a period of rapid transformation, characterized by the emergence of agile, technology-driven players and the increasing sophistication of consumer and merchant demands. This dynamic necessitates a strategic re-evaluation for both acquirers and Third-Party Agents (TPAs) to maintain competitiveness and drive sustainable growth.

Read More
From GARS to VARS: An Overview of the New Standards
Caroline Hometh Caroline Hometh

From GARS to VARS: An Overview of the New Standards

The payment industry’s rapid growth has ushered in new complexities, especially around risk management. In response to evolving threats, in October 2024, Visa retired its Global Acquirer Risk Standard (known as GARS) and replaced it with the Visa Acceptance Risk Standards (now known as VARS). While both sets of guidelines aim to maintain trust and security, the changes reflect how Visa is adapting to new market conditions, regulatory demands, and expanding digital transactions. This article explores why Visa implemented this transition, what the new standards entail, and how they will affect acquirers, merchants, and the broader payment ecosystem.

Read More